Translate

Sunday, December 24, 2017

聖經深度遊植物篇 (七) 棕櫚


正義的人像棕櫚茂盛...(詠92:13

棕櫚這一植物名稱可說是非常空泛,因為從廣義和狹義層面看,「棕櫚」一詞所指的可以是完全不同卻又相關的植物;對教友而言,我們在每年一度的聖枝主日都有機會接觸到被稱為「棕櫚枝」的聖枝,但其實該種「枝條」在植物分類上卻與真正的棕櫚無關,也不是樹枝。下文將介紹何為棕櫚、聖經中所指的棕櫚實為何物、以及澄清聖枝的「真正身份」。

在分類學上,有一類植物多數呈現單枝直立樹幹(有些則多幹),而樹幹的質料則有別於我們所認知的木材,幹較輕而纖維多,在一般情況下很少出現分枝,樹幹一直往上到接近頂端才出現一叢樹葉,形態非常對稱──這一類植物被歸納為「棕櫚科」,全球有約2800種,椰子則是最典型的例子。但狹義地說,在二千多種棕櫚科植物當中,確有一品種名為「棕櫚」,它的自然分佈只限於中國和緬甸,但卻不是聖經中文譯本所指的棕櫚。

聖經中文譯本稱為「棕櫚」的植物,與之前本欄介紹過的植物一樣,原產中東波斯灣一帶,其學名為Phoenix dactylifera,即英文稱為Date Palm的棕櫚科大喬木(高可達25米),正確的中文名稱是──海棗(或棗椰樹)。

海棗經人類長久栽培現已廣泛分佈於多國,用作生產可食用之果實或作園景綠化。聖經中的海棗被譯為棕櫚(Palm,可能是翻譯上為了簡化而作的取捨,也可能是原來已約定俗成的用法。

海棗生性耐旱耐熱,分佈於中東及北非一帶,聳立在當地沙漠中的綠洲(如被稱為棕櫚城的耶里哥-參閱申34:3)上最為出眾。海棗果實外觀似棗,營養豐富,能提供充足能量予沙漠的旅者。當地人民以鮮品、乾果或蜜餞方式食用,也用作動物飼料。海棗強韌的纖維也經常被利用來製作衣料和用具,是沙漠人民生活中不可或缺。海棗在猶太人的文化中非常重要,有說申命紀八章八節中所指福地的八大產物──小麥、大麥、葡萄、無花果、石榴、橄欖、油和蜂蜜,當中的蜂蜜honey)實為海棗果實所製的糖漿而非由蜜蜂而來的花蜜。

基於海棗(棕櫚)以上的種種特性,長久以來它便成為了勝利和光榮的象徵:

在這些事以後,我看見有一大夥群眾,沒有人能夠數清,是來自各邦國、各支派、各民族、各異語的,他們都站在寶座和羔羊面前,身穿白衣,手持棕櫚枝(黙7:9

海棗(棕櫚的象徵意義滲入小亞細亞阿拉伯及地中海沿岸地區不同的文化內,以至在不少建築內都有「棕櫚枝」的裝飾;猶太也不例外,在厄則克耳先知書四十至四十一章就有先知對新聖殿的描述,或多或少也反映了「棕櫚枝」裝飾在當時的普遍程度。根據法律,猶太人過棚節時必須準備「棕櫚枝」(肋23:40);情感上,他們對海棗(棕櫚)的型態也極為讚賞,形容為修長(7:8荗盛(92:13雖已年老,仍然結果,枝葉繁盛,依舊綠茂(詠92:15)。
每逢聖枝主日(基督受難主日),我們皆有機會重溫以下一段福音:

第二天來過節的群眾,聽說耶穌來到耶路撒冷,便拿了棕櫚枝,出去迎接他,喊說:「賀三納! 因上主之名而來的,以色列的君王,應受讚頌。 」(若12:12-13

敎友們也模仿當時猶太人歡迎耶穌進城,拿著「棕櫚枝」誦讀經文。然而,當時群眾以「棕櫚枝」歡迎和表達求助救援的需要(賀三納-Hosanna即求救之意),卻在不久後反口,附和司祭長和法利塞人等捉拿並處死同一個耶穌,變化之大極具戲劇性,耶穌由拯救者一時間變成了被針對和被遺棄的角色。

因此,當我們把「棕櫚枝」帶回家紀念之後,既要緊記打開心扉歡迎耶穌,還要時刻警剔人心之反覆,以準備應對壓力、懷疑、困難、自滿等等對信德的挑戰。


本地教會用於聖枝主日的「棕櫚枝」,其實是來自與棕櫚科完全無關的植物─蘇鐵ycas spp.-的樹葉,並不是樹枝。蘇鐵是裸子植物,屬蘇鐵科,與海棗相比原始得多。以蘇鐵代海棗作為聖枝,除了可能由於蘇鐵在本地貨源較多,其葉形亦與海棗葉相似,再加上蘇鐵葉的葉片細小得多(蘇鐵葉一般最長不過兩尺;而海棗葉可長達兩三米而寛約一米),較適合於聖堂的環境。

Sunday, October 1, 2017

Change of Forest Role and the Approach of Management in Hong Kong 香港的森林角色及管理方針的演變


This paper is published in:
Wong, C.Y. 2017. Change of Forest Role and the Approach of Management in Hong Kong. Proceeding of 2nd Asia Pacific Urban Forestry Meeting. Food and Agriculture Organization, UN
Author presenting at 2nd APUFM, FAO - Seoul 2017
筆者於聯合國粮農組織第二屆亞太城市林務會議 - 首爾 2017


Change of Forest Role and the Approach of Management in Hong Kong
(香港的森林角色及管理方針的演變)
Chiky, Cheuk Yuet WONG
MPhil., BSc., ISA BCMA, TRAQ
President, International Society of Arboriculture Hong Kong Chapter

ABSTRACT
Hong Kong has experienced decades of rampant deforestation since the 17th century.  Since the end of WWII, intensive tree replanting was in place.  Different objectives of reforestation were set along the change of the society’s needs.  The authorities of tree planting and management were also established and reformed according to the role change of the urban forest.  In recent years tree accidents due to aging and diseased trees have drawn much attention from the public.  Increased expectation on tree management such as professionalism of tree practitioners as well as occupational safety has initiated a revolution of urban tree management in the city.  The movement was initiated by the government with the active involvement of professional bodies, trade union and industrial chamber.  Their elevated engagement to steer arboricultural trainings of different levels, industrial regulations, research backup, as well as community-driven programmes will definitely write a new page of urban forestry of this densely-populated city.

Keywords: Reforestation, Urban Forestry, Tree Management, Hong Kong

-          P.O. Box 83282 Concorde Road Post Office, Hong Kong


Background of Hong Kong and its Vegetation
Hong Kong (Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, HKSAR.  Latitude 22° 8´ North and 22° 35´ North, Longitude 113° 49´ East and 114° 31´ East) is located in  southern China, adjoining Guangdong Province.  There is just more than 1,100 sq. km of land, in contrast with approximately 1,655 sq. km of waters.  With 60% of the land being hilly (the tallest hill heighted almost 1,000m) or on steep slopes, and a population of over 7.3 million, dense built-up area is confined within 25% of land, making Hong Kong one of the most congested cities in the world (Figure in 2015[1]).
Located just south of the Tropic of Cancer, climate of Hong Kong is sub-tropical with relatively clear seasonal characters.  The mean temperature in 2016 was 23.6 degree Celsius, maximum temperature being 35.6 degree Celsius in July and minimum being 3.1 degree Celsius in January.  Owing to the seasonal monsoon from the shore, humidity is relatively high (relative humidity average was 81% in 2016) [2].  There is relatively frequent and intense precipitation with total rainfall of over 3,000mm in 2016, concentrated between May and September.  Other than thunderstorm, there is also impact from tropical cyclones (“Typhoons”) that usually happened near end of summer between August and October[3].  Nine typhoons impacting Hong Kong were recorded in 2016 and most of them are associated with heavy and widespread rain.  The prevailing wind direction is northeast, however, concentrated during drier months in winters.  Southerly wind dominates in summers.

With such humid climate, the original vegetation type of the region was suggested to be Southern China Coastal Tropical Rain Forest[4].  The remnant of this, however, is hardly be traced due to continuous human disturbance.  Majority of the vegetation on countryside of Hong Kong was re-established after WWII and the existing top succession type is secondary forest.  Despite intensive interference, the current local vegetation is high in diversity.  There are over 3,300 species of vascular plants (more than 2,000 being indigenous) [5], of which over 450 species are trees.  Native trees comprise over 300 species.  There are far exceeding 130 tree species, of which over 40 are natives, being commonly planted[6] in the urban area, reflecting high diversity.

Types of Urban Forest in Hong Kong
As a metropolis with such a large population size but limited land area, most of the vegetated area within Hong Kong could be reached within 1-hour travel from the built-up areas and is regarded as urban forest in the context of this paper[7].  With this definition, urban forest in Hong Kong includes the following major vegetation types:
1.       Peri-urban forests and plantation woodlands (e.g. country parks)
There are 443 sq. km of country parks and conserved land area in Hong Kong, covering approx. 40% of the territory area.  Functions of these areas include water catchment, recreation, education, and nature conservation.  There are 24 country parks and 22 special areas (particular spots for nature conservation with size from 0.06 ha to 460 ha[8]), scattering all over Hong Kong.  It takes less than an hour for any citizen to reach one of the country parks.  All country parks are opened all year round free-of-charge.

2.       City parks
Most of the parks within urban area are opened to public free-of-charge.  There are over 30 landmark district parks among the 18 districts of the territory.  While most of the parks provide general recreation and leisure facilities, some of them serve specific functions or are thematic such as botanic garden, zoo, Chinese landscape, special sport grounds and heritage conservation.[9]

3.       Pocket parks, gardens and amenity areas with trees
Other than landmark district parks, there are uncountable numbers of smaller public parks and gardens within the dense built area.  Most of them are planted with trees.  The smallest amenity areas may be just a tiny pocket of 10 sq. m in size.  This category also includes gardens and parks within private / leased lands.   Trees on private lands also contribute much to the greenery of Hong Kong.  Although most of them has restriction on access, the tree canopy does contribute lowering the temperature of the dense city and improving the landscape that is shared amongst the public.  Some private gardens (e.g. theme parks) could be accessed with permission or fees.

4.       Roadside planting
This refers to tree planting along public or restricted roads, either in tree pits or strip pieces of planting beds.

5.       Other green spaces with trees
This includes, but not limited to, abandoned / undeveloped lands, agricultural plots, river banks, mangroves, cemeteries, atriums/podium/roof gardens[10] and village areas.  Some of the land may be privately-owned.

History of Urban Forestry in Hong Kong
Development of Hong Kong started rapidly after WWII, but the destruction of natural habitats for fire wood had been much earlier.  It is believed that large-scale deforestation began from the 17th century, when more villagers inhabited the hillside.  Deforestation was nearly completed after the 1840s, when available literature describes the local landscape as ‘barren’ or ‘bare’[11], except some remnants of isolated forests[12].

After British establishing its colony in Hong Kong, large-scale reforestation with record began since 1880.  It was recorded in late 1930s that there were about 47 sq. km of plantation on the Hong Kong Island alone.  However, reforestation during that period focused mainly on fuel wood production[13].  It is believed that some levels of landscape improvement and conservation appeared at the same time since majority of the British or rich foreigners lived on mid-hills of Hong Kong Island.  It is difficult to refer those planting efforts as urban tree planting due to the small population at that time (population size 849,800 in 1931)[14].

The real urban forest establishment in Hong Kong happened after the end of WWII in 1945, when most original plantations were cleared during Japanese occupation[15].  With rapid population expansion in the few years afterwards (2,200,000 in 1950 after civil war in Mainland China[16]), the government started to increase the number and volume of reservoirs in the countryside[17].  Massive and systematic tree plantings, led by then Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries were implemented around reservoirs and along water catchments for erosion control since 1953 (the 4 major plantation zones are at Tai Lam, Shing Mun, Tai Po Kau and Shek Pik with total area of 68.5 sq. km).  Most of the current 24 country parks are in fact located around reservoirs and the associated water catchments (total plantation area >125 sq. km) [18].  All country parks are regulated under the Country Park Ordinance promulgated since 1976 and the first country park was established in 1977[19].  During that time, country parks were managed under the renamed Agriculture and Fisheries Department (AFD).  After decades of development and change of planting approach from erosion control to conservation, country parks and conservation issues are now under the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD).  The name change also reveals the shifting of focus in the establishment and management of forest in the countryside.

In contrast with countryside, urban parks were planned and managed under the then Urban Services Department (USD) established since 1960.  That department (formerly Sanitary Department) was a general municipal department which served not only greenery, but also sanitary, local welfare, leisure and sports issues.  Other than parks, systematic urban planting had not commenced until the setting up of urban greening committee under Urban Council and referencing to successfully-established new towns (with planned greenery) since 1970s.   USD was later restructured in 2000 to the current Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD), which manages all public parks, gardens, roadside trees and since 2004, the registration of Old and Valuable Trees (OVTs).  With hygiene matters excluded, the function of LCSD still covers services other than greenery.

Government Structure in Tree Management
Country parks and city parks/gardens have made up a large portion of the city greenery, but there is another portion of greenery which is also significant.  Due to the hilly terrain in most part of Hong Kong, there has been increasing numbers of modified slopes along the development of the territory.  Such engineered slopes, most commonly vegetated with trees, are currently under the maintenance of various public works departments such as Drainage Department, Highway Department, Housing Department, Water Services Department, etc.  Engineered slopes within other government venues are maintained by another department – Architectural Services Department[20].  All these departments do maintain all the trees on their slopes.

Such decentralized arrangement of tree management is termed “Integrated Approach on Tree Management” by the HKSAR Government[21].  There was no supervising department above these tree-managing departments until the setting up of Tree Management Office (TMO) in 2009.  TMO, under Greening, Landscape and Tree Management Section (GLTMS) of Development Bureau, though so named, does not have actual management operation on urban trees.  Instead, it serves as a policy making and consulting unit on tree issues raised by other governmental departments.
Inherited from government development on municipal services, there are currently 3 main streams/grades of government officers responsible for tree management under the above structure.  They are:

1.       Forestry Officer under the system of Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department – their duties cover conservation, management of country park and other conserved areas, etc.
2.       Leisure Service Officer under the system of Leisure and Cultural Services Department – their duties cover diverse services including sports, recreation, cultural activities, as well as park and street tree management.
3.       Landscape Architect under the system of public works departments – their duties include planning, design and upkeeping of urban landscape within government premises.
Various government departments appoint staff with reference to these grade(s) and associated duties for handling tree issues.  On the other hand, officers from the above 3 systems would be seconded to other departments to input support and advise on tree-related issues.

Manpower on Tree Works
Most of the tree planting and maintenance works in Hong Kong is conducted by gardeners or landscape contractors.  They not only work on trees on private lands, but also significant amount of trees from the public sector as works are contracted out by the government.  Currently there are approved lists of landscape contractors for public works[22], but there are in fact not much technical requirement on qualifications and skill levels of manpower.  Much of the tree planting and maintenance work is still delivered by gardeners or untrained casual labours – instead of professionals with specific skill, regardless of the increased awareness on tree care in recent years.  Attempts have been made from the landscape industry to register “landscape works” (including tree works) as a recognized trade under the construction industry.  However, this attempt was of no avail and those workers are still regarded as casual and unskilled labours.

Tree Accidents
In recent 10 years, there have been several fatal tree accidents (Table 1) which raised the awareness of the public on proper tree management.  After a fatal accident in 2008 that was widely covered by media, the government established the TMO according a specific task force’s recommendations, in response to the comment of the Coroner’s Court.  Since establishment, TMO has promulgated various guidelines and instructions to government departments on tree risk assessment and management.  Though there is no formal ordinance regulating tree professional practice, tree-management departments generally follow the direction suggested by GLMTS/TMO.

Table 1. Record of tree fatal accident from 2008 to 2017
Date
Location
Planter type
Failure type
Tree owner
Victim
27/8/2008
Stanley
Street pit
Trunk
Government
1 pedestrian
14/6/2010
Shatin
Slope
Branch
Government
1 cyclist
11/10/2012
Tai Po
Abandon land
Branch
Government
1 passenger in truck
14/8/2014
Mid-level
Slope
Whole tree
Private
1 pregnant pedestrian

Among the 4 fatal accidents, 3 of the trees involved were under the maintenance of the government.  Pressure had been put solely on the municipal units who were responsible for the trees, until the accident in 2014 in which a tree failed and killed a pregnant woman.  The tree was identified to be under the management of a private property.  It led to increased awareness of the general public in taking care of trees within their premises.  Other than fatal accidents, there have been around 80 reported cases of tree failure resulting in injury (20 nos.) and/or property damage (62 nos.) between 2013 and 2015[23].

In order to offer guidelines and professional advice on tree management, specially to property owners, GLTMS compiled the first comprehensive tree management handbook in 2016[24].  The handbook also stated clearly the legal responsibility of tree owners and management agencies.  The document also forms part of the Code of Practice on Building Management and Maintenance under the Building Management Ordinance in order to strengthen the regulation.

Tree Works and Occupational Safety
There has been no specific regulation on the training or qualification of tree workers, other than the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Ordinance, which generally applies to all industry.  Gardeners and casual labours had been the major work force in tree works.  However, the quality of works such as pruning varies and malpractice was commonly reported.

As tree works are quite specific in nature and procedure, general OSH instructions such as Works at Height may not be applicable or feasible.  For example, working platform or scaffolding is not applicable to most scenarios for tree pruning, while aerial lift may not be able to reach the tree or the tree part.  Tools for tree works such as chainsaw are also not regulated in Hong Kong currently.  There are numerous cases of accident in the course of tree works and some results in serious injuries or even death (Table 2).

Table 2. Reported accidents/incidents related to tree works between 2007 and April 2016[25]
Date
Victim
Type of injury/Incident
Associated tools / procedure
2007/11/21
Worker
Head injury
Climbing
2008/10/20
Worker
Multiple injuries
Climbing, improper PPE
2009/06/26
Worker
Head injury
Climbing
2009/10/18
Worker
Head injury
Ladder
2010/10/09
Worker
Aerial trap
Aerial platform
2010/10/21
Worker
Head injury
Improper PPE
2011/10/06
Worker
Bone fracture
Ladder
2012/02/27
Worker
Fatal
Climbing
2012/12/17
Worker
Head injury
Improper PPE
2013/08/07
Worker
Burn injury
Gasoline
2014/03/30
Worker
Limb injury
Chainsaw
2016/04/28
Worker
Head injury
Risk assessment before works

Recent Movements in Urban Forestry
There is no tree ordinance in Hong Kong.  Most of the trees in the territory are currently protected via a few legislations in relation to tree protection, such as Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap. 96) for government lands, Country park Ordinance (Cap. 208) for Country parks, Crimes Ordinance (Cap. 200) and Theft Ordinance (Cap. 210) for general unlawful acts.  Interference on public trees without permission is illegal.  On the other hand, trees on most private (leased) lands are protected by administration means through relevant terms in the lease.  Therefore, in most scenarios any interference on trees shall be approved by the government.  In recent years, the government issued or updated numerous technical circular and practice notes[26], entailing and emphasising requirements on arboriculture training of competent persons in handling such applications and supervising tree works.

Due to previous fatal accidents, tree risk assessment has become the most concerned element on tree management.  There has been continuous effort between the government and industry on increasing the number of trained or accredited competent persons who are qualified to conduct tree risk assessment.  Other than accreditations provided by international professional organizations such as Tree Risk Assessment Qualification by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), a wide range of international and local qualifications including short, non-assessment-based courses are also recognized by the government[27].

With the plantation role shifting from erosion control and fire break to conservation, increasing efforts are made since 1980s to increase the diversity of existing forest through enrichment planting.  Native species were planted among established exotic plantations, as advocated by local green groups.  For new plantation in infrastructure projects, matrix of exotics and natives also became popular since the 1990s.  Plantation Enrichment Project (PEP), rolled out in 2009, further reinforce the effort in replacing aging exotic trees.  The same approach was later extended to non-Country park plantations[28].  With the coverage of Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) extended to Hong Kong SAR since 2011 and formulation of city-level Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (BSAP) in 2016, the conservation role of urban forest has become distant and that would reshape the management approach and increase emphasis on knowledge acquisition.

Capacity Building
With increasing awareness of tree care, the number of tree-related accidents is also on the rise.  There has been a movement within the industry calling out to improve the quality and training of tree care practitioners.  The first batch of Certified Arborists (CAs) of ISA – a certification through examination - was practising in Hong Kong since mid-2000s, together with Certified Tree Worker – Climber Specialists (CTW-CS).  After more than 10 years’ development, there are more than 1,000 CAs and approx. 100 CTW-CS in Hong Kong by May 2017[29] (Table 3).  CA, being one of the earliest credentials in arboriculture introduced to Hong Kong, has become a recognized tree professional certification by the government.  Significant number of CAs are government officers, while another major portion is from practitioners working in the private sector providing services to government contracts, as well as private clients such as properties management, contractor, etc.




Table 3. Number of ISA/ISAHK’s credential holders in Hong Kong (as at 8 May 2017)
Certification/Qualification
Issuing authority
Requirement(s)
No.
Certified Arborist (CA)
ISA
3 years experience in arboriculture /
arboriculture degree + 1-2 years experience
1012
CA Municipal Specialist (MS)
ISA
CA + 3 years experience in urban tree management
31
Board Certified Master Arborist (BCMA)
ISA
CA + ^sufficient points in experience, formal education, related credential
11
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified
(TRAQ)
ISA
Recognized credentials or formal academic training
221
Certified Tree Worker Climber Specialist (CTW-CS)
ISA
1.5 years tree climbing experience +
First-aid, CPR, aerial rescue training
93
*Qualified Chainsaw and Pruning (Ground) Technician (QCPT)
ISAHK
1.5 years chainsaw operation experience
26
*Programme launched in 2015; ^Refer to ISA’s website (www.isa-arbor.com)

With rapidly increasing demand since the early 2010s, there has also been growing number of arboriculture educational programmes provided by local institutions and training organizations.  While most of the programmes are part-time basis for practitioners or beginners who are interested in the industry, full time vocational training programmes targeted at high school graduates appeared first in 2014 (Table 4).  All these programmes, except the higher diploma programme, are provided by self-financing institutions, however.

Table 4. List of full-time academic programme related to arboriculture.
Academic programme
Institution
Type /*QF Level
Since
Conservation and Tree Management
Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education
Higher Diploma / 4
2014
^Horticulture and Landscape Management
Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong
Bachelor / 5
2015
Tree Management
Hong Kong Baptist University, College of International Education
Associate Degree / 4
2015
*QF: Qualification Framework of Hong Kong
^Part of the admissions is subsidized by the government though it is offered by a self-financing institution

Since more than 30 years ago, the government has organized trainings to staff managing trees.  However, as it is a known practice for government officers to shift roles within the same department every several years.  It happened frequently that the trained officers were moved to positions not related to trees while the new staff would pick up tree duties without prior trainings in trees.  Currently there is still no mandatory academic requirement on arboriculture / urban forestry for applicants to tree-related governmental posts.

As the urban forestry industry continues to develop in Hong Kong, queries on the existing tree management system as well as professionalism[30] and career prospects of qualified practitioners are on the rise.  In 2016 the GLTMS took the lead to consult various organizations in the industry (including ISA Hong Kong Chapter, trade unions and industry chambers) and to lay out a professional development route map.  There are two parallel pathways agreed between the industry and the government on quality enhancement of arboricultural services:

1.       Standardization of training through the establishment of Qualification Framework (QF) for the Horticulture and Arboriculture Industry as a whole;
2.       Definition of roles and responsibilities, and also regulation on practitioners, to be developed within a newly formed collaborative industrial organization – Horticulture and Arboriculture Trade Confederation (HATC).

The first path is steered by the Education Bureau of the government and the process is targeted to be completed within 2 years (by 2019).  The second path is led by the industry with the collaboration of different stakeholder groups.  A major objective is to formulate an industrial plan for the long-term professional development and enhancement of tree management quality.  At the same time, the government is conducting a manpower survey within the arboriculture and horticulture sectors, which ever share notable resources in the territory.  The results will definitely help in planning of resources and further development of urban tree management.

Research
Proper tree management depends on our understanding of trees – their biology, physiology and response to environmental factors.  Available data on tree species either local or planted in Hong Kong is very limited and there exists large knowledge gaps regarding tree management.  Currently most of the scientific research is conducted by students and teaching staff of subsidized tertiary institutions.  There are pieces of small-scale research on urban forestry or tree management, but the scale is piecemeal and popularity is far lagging behind from that of other areas such as biotechnology, engineering and environmental science.  In fact there is no academic programme on arboriculture or urban tree management offered by these subsidized institutions.  All existing programmes are vocational and therefore without strong research backup.

Community Involvement
The government has played a very active role in urban forest management, from large-scale plantations at the beginning to laying down direction on tree risk management in recent years.  However, relatively little involvement from the community has been incubated and resources had been heavily relied on the government.  The earliest large-scale community involvement on urban forestry was the annual public tree planting campaign organized by the government since 1957.  This task-base event has continued to be popular among the public and had attracted more than 10,000 citizens to take part in recent years.  Corporate Afforestation Scheme since 1998 was another attempt to get community involved in the process of planting as well as maintenance (a short term for 3 years before handing over to the government).  The above schemes were led by AFCD with increased involvement of the public from merely planting to maintenance.  The upgraded version of Plantation Enrichment Project (also under AFCD) since 2016 further enhances the involvement of the community through engaging non-profit organizations from planning, through planting to management stages for at least 5 years[31].  This is the first well-structured public forest management programme in Hong Kong.

Other than country parks, the government has launched several Greening Master Plan (GMP) projects on a phase-by-phase basis covering major built areas of Hong Kong since 2004[32].  The main objective of the projects is to increase greenery coverage in built-up areas and do not form additional parks or gardens.  Systematic consultation to local communities at the planning stage has been the main community involvement, though there were some opportunities for community planting in localized areas.

Other than government-led programmes, some local non-profit organizations have also initiated tree planting programmes within the territory.  A non-profit-led urban forestry programme with the widest community involvement is a donation scheme through a locally popular E-payment system.  Part of the transactions are donated to planting (trees and other plants) in the city[33].  Benefited from the popularity and convenience of the payment system, this funded-planting programme has drawn the participation of a large number of people.  Maintenance of the plantings is handed back to the venue owners.  Involvement of the citizens is confined to payment, awareness to tree conservation and greening is in doubt but the programme has made a record in term of quantitative involvement.
With a few exceptions of particular nature reserves or private lands with conservation concerns[34], virtually there is no public forest entrusted to community for management, as happened in other countries such as UK and the US.

Conclusion on the Way Forward
Many plantations in Hong Kong have reached an age of over 60 years.  While woodlands in the countryside can be further developed with enrichment planting, aging symptoms are not uncommon on many old trees in the built-up area due to less-favourable growing conditions.  As more information is available to the public, the increased expectation on proper tree management is pressing the municipal authority to review its management approach.  Requests ranged from enhancing conservation measures, improving professionalism of manpower in delivering arboriculture services, upgrading standards in tree management and a more transparent system are diverting a holistic approach in urban forest management.

Notwithstanding the existing pieces of regulations, it is now a right time to consider a collective ordinance which comprehensively covers all critical aspects of tree conservation and management, defining the responsibility and proper practice, as well as consequence of unlawful acts.  In parallel to this, a review of manpower within the government including frontline workers, management staff and policy makers, as well as entry requirements for each position is equally important.  With such enhancement, the government can also review and simplify the current tree management structure so that resources can be centralized while professionals can be collectively appointed for making efficient management decisions.

With increased number of trained persons and clear goal established for urban forestry, it becomes more practical for the industry to define clearly the requirements for different levels of practitioners on urban tree management and related works (e.g. setting tree climbing qualification according to international standard to be mandatory requirements for tree workers).  A review and screening of the existing various trainings or qualifications shall be conducted to standardize the competency of practitioners (e.g. aligning training contents as well as the requirement of refreshing skills and knowledge in areas such as tree risk assessment and other work skills).

Proper tree management is linked to accurate and up-to-date scientific data, more public resources should be allocated to support universities and non-profit organizations to conduct research on this subject.  This would help find solutions to various tree diseases, improving public safety, improving the vitality of old trees and provide direction for new tree planting.

With increased awareness on tree conservation, it is possible to explore partnerships with non-profits or private stakeholders in tree management[35].  Such collaborative models have been adopted in other countries, allowing increased positive community involvement in urban forest management and better allocation of public resources.

Urban forestry is different fundamentally from individual tree management that has been practised for decades with a single leader – the government.  More expectations on the function of urban forest imply increased demands on resources.  Successful transition from the existing management system (single task) to one which will take care of increased services (multi-tasks) depends on innovative ideas and collaborations among interested groups.  In other words, the society could no longer be satisfied by the number of planted trees (e.g. 18.8 million trees planted by different departments from 2001 to 2010)[36], but it would concern more on the quality of urban forest so established.



[1] Anon. (2016) Hong Kong Fact Sheet. HKSAR Government
[2] Anon. (2017). Weather Report 2016. Hong Kong Observatory
[3] Hong Kong Observatory’s website. Climate of Hong Kong. www.hko.gov.hk
[4] Anon. (1976). Vegetation of Guangdong Province. Science Press, Beijing (In Chinese)
[5] Hong Kong Herbarium’s website. HK Plant Database. www.herbarium.gov.hk
[6] Anon. (2014). A Photographic Guide to Common Urban Trees of Hong Kong. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, HKSAR Government
[7] Salvitano, F, et al (2016). Guidelines on Urban and Peri-urban Forestry. FAO UN
[8] Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department’s website. http://www.afcd.gov.hk/
[9] Leisure Culture Services Department’s website. www.lcsd.gov.hk
[10] Roloff, A. (2016). Urban trees: Features and Requirements.  In: Urban Tree Management for Sustainable Development of Green Cities. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex. PP. 15-19
[11] Hinds R.B. & Bentham G. (1842) Remarks on the physical aspect, climate, and vegetation of Hong Kong, China. London Journal of Botany 1: 476-481.
[12] Daley, P.A. (1970). Man's influence on the vegetation of Hong Kong. In Anon. The Vegetation of Hong Kong: its Structure and Change: Proceedings of a Weekend Symposium. Royal Asiatic Society (Hong Kong Branch), Hong Kong. pp. 44-55.
[13] Dudgeon, D. and Corlett, R.T. (1994). Hill and Streams. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong
[14] Hong Kong Census 1931 data
[15] Dudgeon, D. and Corlett, R. (1994). Hills and Streams: An Ecology of Hong Kong. HKU Press, Hong Kong
[16] Chan, S.H., Leung and Beatrice (2003). Changing Church and State Relations in Hong Kong, 1950-2000. Hong Kong: HK university press
[17] Water Services Department’s website. www.wsd.gov.hk
[18] Anon. (1999). Plantation Works of AFD. Agriculture and Fisheries Department leaflet
[19] Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department’s website. www.afcd.gov.hk
[20] Anon. (2016). Report of Direct Investigation into Government’s Tree Management Regime and Practices. Office of the Ombudsman, HKSAR Government
[21] Anon. (2009). Report of the Task Force on Tree Management: People, Trees, Harmony. HKSAR Government
[22] Development Bureau’s website. The List of Approved Suppliers of Materials and Specialist Contractors for Public Works (the Specialist List). www.devb.gov.hk
[23] News search through database Wisers
[24] Anon. (2016), Handbook on Tree Management. GLTMS
[25] News search through database Wisers
[26] Development Bureau Technical Circular (Works) No. 7/2015; and Lands Administration Office of Lands Department Practice Note No. 7/2007
[27] Anon. (2015). Guideline for Tree Risk Assessment and Management Arrangement. Greening, Landscape and Tree Management Section, Development Bureau, HKSAR Government
[28] Anon. (2016). Enhancement Programme of Vegetated Slopes of Highway Department (Phased Replacement of Senescent Acacia).  Highway Department, HKSAR Government
[29] Internal data of International Society of Arboriculture
[30] Anon. (2016). Report of Direct Investigation into Government’s Tree Management Regime and Practices. Office of the Ombudsman
[31] Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department’s website. www.afcd.gov.hk
[32] Anon. (2012). Greening Master Plan Booklet. Civil Engineering Department, HKSAR Government
[33] Green Power’s website. www.greenpower.org.hk; and EPS iDo’s website. www.eps.com.hk/ido/eng/
[34] Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department’s website. www.afcd.gov.hk
[35] Pretzsch, J. (2016). Governance in Urban Forestry.  In Roloff, A. Urban Tree Management for Sustainable Development of Green Cities. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex. PP. 221-235
[36] Anon. (2012). Greening Master Plan Booklet. Civil Engineering Department, HKSAR Government